A Specialist AI Law Practice

Start from reality

We start from your product, your users, your investors, and your actual constraints — not from a template. AI law questions are often genuinely novel, and the answer depends on specifics.

Translate, don’t just analyse

Regulatory language needs to become product decisions, contract terms, and governance procedures. We translate — from what the EU AI Act says to what your engineering team needs to do.

Tell you what we don’t know

AI regulation is genuinely uncertain in places. We tell you what is clear, what is grey, and where we are making a judgment call — rather than presenting everything as settled law.

WCR Legal is a boutique AI law practice. We focus exclusively on the legal questions that arise from building, deploying, investing in, and regulating AI systems.

We are a small team. We prefer a limited number of projects where we can be genuinely useful over a large volume of work where we are one of many firms involved. Most of our clients work with us across multiple engagements — not just once.

We advise across the EU, UAE, UK, and globally. We work with non-EU companies on EU AI Act obligations, UAE companies expanding into EU markets, and global platforms navigating multiple regulatory frameworks simultaneously.

What we are not

×

×

×

×

AI Model Licensing & Governance

License agreements for AI models, EU AI Act compliance frameworks, internal AI policies, and risk classification. The regulatory core of operating an AI product.

AI Risk & Liability

Structuring liability across the AI supply chain — MSAs, indemnification, insurance assessment, and the EU AI Liability Directive for AI vendors and deployers.

Cross-Border AI Compliance

EU AI Act, UAE AI regulation, and UK frameworks mapped into one compliance model for companies operating across multiple markets.

AI Corporate Structuring

IP holding entities, intra-group licensing, jurisdiction selection, and SPV design for AI companies and investors.

AI Due Diligence

Legal due diligence for AI investments and acquisitions — IP chain, training data provenance, EU AI Act readiness, and contract analysis.

Digital Likeness & Avatars

Consent frameworks, digital persona IP, synthetic media compliance, and post-mortem digital identity for avatar platforms and creators.

🏗

AI companies

Startups and scale-ups building AI products — from pre-seed to Series B. Model licensing, governance frameworks, regulatory compliance, and structuring as they grow.

🔬

AI investors

VC and PE funds conducting AI due diligence, structuring AI investments through SPVs, and advising portfolio companies on regulatory readiness before fundraising or exit.

🏢

Enterprise deployers

Companies integrating third-party AI into their products and operations. Governance frameworks, vendor contracts, EU AI Act compliance, and liability allocation.

🎭

Creators and media

Individuals, studios, and platforms working with digital personas, AI avatars, synthetic media, and post-mortem digital identity products.

01

Initial mapping

We map your product or situation to the relevant legal frameworks — EU AI Act classification, IP ownership, liability exposure, jurisdictional obligations. We identify where the real decisions are.

02

Structure and scope

We propose a concrete scope of work with clear deliverables and timeline. We tell you what is certain and what involves judgment calls before we start.

03

Execution

We draft documents, build frameworks, and prepare positions. We stay available for questions throughout — not just at delivery.

04

Ongoing

Most clients stay with us after the initial engagement. AI regulation and your product both evolve — legal structures need to keep pace.

Clarity over comprehensiveness

We give you what you need to make a decision — not a 40-page memo that covers every possible angle without telling you what to do. Trade-offs are explained. Risks are quantified where possible.

Consistency across jurisdictions

We maintain a single view of your project across entities, licenses, and markets. You don’t get conflicting advice from different local counsels that you have to reconcile yourself.

Specialist, not generalist

AI law is what we do. Not as a department of a larger firm, not as an add-on to a tech practice — as the practice itself. The depth shows in the questions we ask and the structures we build.